Minggu, 09 Oktober 2011

Pretransplant Risk Score for New-Onset Diabetes After Kidney Transplantation

Pretransplant Risk Score for New-Onset Diabetes After Kidney Transplantation. New-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation (NODAT) has adverse clinical and economic implications. A risk score for NODAT could help identify research subjects for intervention studies.

A risk score computed from seven simple pretransplant variables can identify risk of NODAT.

New-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation (NODAT) occurs frequently in the 1st year after transplant (incidence 15–25%) and has a significant impact on allograft and patient survival, health care costs, and quality of life (1–4). In a large, retrospective study of U.S. Renal Data System data, NODAT was associated with a 60% increase in subsequent graft failure, an almost 90% increase in death rates (3), and frequent diabetes complications (5). NODAT incurs an extra Medicare payment of $21,500 per case by 2 years’ posttransplant (4).

These are compelling reasons for prevention. However, clinical trials of prevention strategies may have greater power if conducted among patients at highest risk. Because the incidence of NODAT is 5 to 6 times higher the 1st year after transplant (15–25%), compared with the annual incidence thereafter (4–6%), pretransplant risk factors may play significant roles in the development of NODAT. Previous studies have identified many risk factors for NODAT including older age, minority race, higher BMI, corticosteroid use, family history of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hepatitis C seropositivity, male donor, and elevations in pretransplant fasting glucose and triglycerides (1–3).

We previously found inpatient hyperglycemia and its treatment with insulin immediately after transplantation to predict NODAT (6). Ideally, we could identify those at highest risk of NODAT well before transplantation to provide early intervention. Our aim was therefore to construct a risk score for NODAT using simple pretransplant clinical and laboratory tests. Such a score could help identify patients at highest risk of NODAT for intervention or enrollment in prevention clinical trials.

Sabtu, 01 Oktober 2011

Coffee Consumption and Prostate Cancer Risk and Progression in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study

Coffee Consumption and Prostate Cancer Risk and Progression in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study
Coffee Consumption and Prostate Cancer Risk and Progression in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Coffee contains many geologically committed compounds, counting caffeine and phenolic acids, with the intention of be inflicted with heady antioxidant endeavor and can affect glucose metabolism and masculinity hormone levels. Because of these biological activities, coffee could be associated with a cut-rate expose of prostate cancer.

Methods We conducted a prospective analysis of 47 911 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study who reported intake of regular and decaffeinated coffee in 1986 and each 4 years thereafter. From 1986 to 2006, 5035 patients with prostate cancer were identified, counting 642 patients with lethal prostate cancers, defined as fatal or metastatic. We used Cox proportional hazards models to assess the friendship linking coffee and prostate cancer, adjusting pro the makings puzzling by smoking, stoutness, and other variables. All P principles were from two-sided tests.

Results The mean intake of coffee in 1986 was 1.9 cups for every time. Men who consumed six or more cups for every time had a decrease adjusted relation expose pro overall prostate cancer compared with nondrinkers (RR = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68 to 0.98, Ptrend = .10). The friendship was stronger pro lethal prostate cancer (consumers of more than six cups of coffee for every time: RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.75, Ptrend = .03). Coffee consumption was not associated with the expose of nonadvanced or low-grade cancers and was single imperceptibly inversely associated with high-grade cancer. The inverse friendship with lethal cancer was akin pro regular and decaffeinated coffee (each lone cup for every time increment: RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.01, P = .08 pro regular coffee and RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.00, P = .05 pro decaffeinated coffee). The age-adjusted incidence tariff pro men who had the highest (≥6 cups for every day) and lowest (no coffee) coffee consumption were 425 and 519 whole prostate cancers, correspondingly, for every 100 000 person-years and 34 and 79 lethal prostate cancers, correspondingly, for every 100 000 person-years.

Conclusions We experimental a strong inverse friendship linking coffee consumption and expose of lethal prostate cancer. The friendship appears to be correlated to non-caffeine components of coffee.

Effects of Coffee Consumption on Fasting Blood Glucose and Insulin Concentrations Randomized controlled trials in healthy volunteers

Effects of Coffee Consumption on Fasting Blood Glucose and Insulin Concentrations Randomized controlled trials in healthy volunteers
Effects of Coffee Consumption on Fasting Blood Glucose and Insulin Concentrations Randomized controlled trials in healthy volunteers. The studies were standard by the TNO Nutrition and Food Research Medical Ethics Committee, and all participants gave informed consent. The trials were originally designed to study the things of coffee and caffeine on plasma concentrations of homocysteine, and the study designs be inflicted with been reported in point previously . Participants were regular coffee consumers (more than five cups/day) and did not be inflicted with renowned diabetes.

The initially study was a 4-week crossover study with the intention of compared the things of regular paper-filtered coffee consumption with with the intention of of coffee abstinence. A whole of 40 volunteers used 1 l of coffee (70 g coffee grounds) pro 4 weeks and abstained from coffee pro 4 weeks in random order. Fourteen participants did not complete the trial since of nausea and impatience (n = 7), doable susceptibility to adverse things of caffeine intake (n = 3), or reasons unrelated to behavior (n = 4). Thus, 26 participants were built-in in the analysis. The following study had a Latin-square design with three treatments agreed in random order pro 2 weeks all: Caffeine (a whole of 870 mg in six capsules), regular paper-filtered coffee (52 g ground coffee/day in 0.9 l), and excuse (six capsules containing cellulose). Of the 54 volunteers, 6 subjects withdrew since of brutal headaches (n = 2), study-related illness (n = 1), or reasons unrelated to behavior (n = 3). For the current analyses, we disqualified participants since of missing blood samples (n = 1), not completing the total caffeine intervention (n = 1), or who were apparent outliers pro an insulin concentration (n = 1). Thus, 45 subjects were built-in in the analysis. Caffeine-containing products (other than persons provided) were prohibited all through the full trial. Venous blood samples were collected with an overnight fast. Plasma glucose concentrations were measured using the glucose hexokinase method. Serum insulin concentrations were measured using an immunoradiometric assay (Medgenix Biosource Diagnostics, Fleuris, Belgium).

Inside study 1, behavior responses were compared using paired t tests. Inside study 2, we tested pro overall behavior things using ANOVA. All reported P principles were two sided, and P principles <0.05 were considered statistically noteworthy.

Of the participants with the intention of concluded the study, 62% were women, mean (±SD) age was 37 ± 12 years, and mean BMI was 23 ± 3 kg/m2. After 2 weeks, coffee consumption tended to principal to privileged fasting glucose concentrations, but thumbs down substantial effect was experimental with 4 weeks . Fasting insulin concentrations, measured single with 4 weeks, were privileged with the coffee cycle than with the thumbs down coffee cycle. Tests pro carry-over things did not indicate with the intention of these existed (insulin: P = 0.79; glucose: P = 0.27).

We found with the intention of distinguished coffee consumption pro 4 weeks increased fasting insulin concentrations compared with coffee abstinence. Consumption of somewhat weaker coffee and caffeine intake were nonsignificantly associated with privileged fasting insulin concentrations. No significant things of coffee or caffeine on fasting glucose concentrations were experimental.

The increased fasting insulin concentration with distinguished coffee consumption in our study probably reflects decreased insulin sensitivity. Inside short-term metabolic studies, caffeine intake very lowered insulin sensitivity ended 100–180 min . Inside a study of 5 days of caffeine intake, complete tolerance to the things of caffeine on fasting glucose concentrations urban , but things on norepinephrine and emancipated full of fat acid concentrations partly remained pro the high-dose caffeine behavior. Thus, things of distinguished amounts of caffeine on catecholamines and emancipated full of fat acids could be inflicted with contributed to a decrease in insulin sensitivity in our studies. However, we cannot completely exclude the likelihood with the intention of the elevated insulin concentrations with coffee consumption were due to privileged insulin discharge or to cut-rate hepatic insulin clearance as a upshot of increased emancipated full of fat acid concentrations .

Our findings seem to be by variance with the inverse friendship linking coffee consumption and expose pro type 2 diabetes with the intention of has been experimental in followers studies. Several factors could say to this discrepancy. First, the results of followers studies could imitate the things of decades of regular coffee consumption, while the bestow study compared 2–4 weeks of coffee consumption with 2–4 weeks of coffee abstinence. Second, we cannot exclude the likelihood with the intention of the rapid transition to distinguished coffee consumption (equivalent to ∼13 square cups of coffee in study 1) in our studies had negative things on insulin sensitivity. For model, veteran psychological stress could be inflicted with lowered insulin sensitivity through increased stress hormone concentrations. Third, habitual coffee consumption could increase aspects of glucose metabolism with the intention of are not reflected in the outcome parameters of the bestow study (for model, postprandial glucose metabolism).

Inside conclusion, the bestow results indicate with the intention of tolerance to the adverse things of distinguished coffee consumption on insulin-glucose homeostasis does not develop surrounded by a 4-week cycle. This stresses with the intention of it is premature to advocate distinguished coffee consumption as a earnings to decrease expose pro type 2 diabetes. Long-term trials of coffee consumption with the intention of include detailed measures of insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism are right to reveal the obvious discrepancy with studies with the intention of experimental an inverse friendship linking habitual coffee consumption and expose pro type 2 diabetes.